Monday, September 29, 2025

एक निर्णनय —

मरे हुए पे कौन मरता है साहिब,
ज़ालिम को कौन याद करता है,
 साहिब।

मुबारक हो तुम्हें वो सब बुलंदियाँ,
मगर सफ़र अभी बहुत तय करना है, 
साहिब।

इस कश्ती के खेवट हो तुम ही जनाब,
हर तूफ़ां को भी तो पार करना है, 
साहिब।

थोड़ी चिन्गारी —अपनी हसरतों की चिताओं से उधार ले लो,
अब नया कोई अफ़साना भी तो शुरू करना है,
साहिब।
- 'मैं' द्वारा। 
ये देदो, वो देदो... 
यहां एक गुरू(अगर आपको हर शिक्षा के मन्दिरों में किसी औहदे पर बैठने वाला लगता है तो)... अपने विद्यार्थि उर्फ स्कॉलर से मांगता रहता है।
उसने विद्यार्थि को बदले में क्या दिया, आप आगे खुद ही निर्णनय लीजिएगा।

न समय की कीमत,
न समझ की परख,
न इंसान की पहचान l 
खुद को- गुरू कहने वाले ने सिर्फ छीना और कुचला अपनी महत्वकांक्षाओं को पुरा करने को ...
एक विद्यार्थि का - 
ज्ञान, सूकून, आत्मविश्वास, मनोबल, और 
...एक एक कर मांग बढ़ती गई...
मांग थी कुछ सौगातों की, उपहारों की ... और दक्षिणा ....
वही ...गुरू वाली... 
और फिर एक दिन... मांगा इस्तीफा... दूर जाता देख अपने नौकर ... माफ कीजिए गा... स्कॉलर को।
बस बहुत हुआ...हां बस और नहीं...थोड़ा और...नहीं!!... 
जब बर्दाश्त नहीं कर पाया वो स्कॉलर... 
इतनी बेचैनी..
नहीं ले पाया निर्णनय —दासिता स्वीकार करने के पक्ष में...
नहीं सांस ले पा रहा था वो... वह जहां था ...
वहां की वायू में —लोभ,वासना और छल-कपट का जहर घुल चुका था।
ये जहर के छीटे जो उसके पूज्य गुरू ने, न जाने कब उसके चरित्र पर डालने शुरू कर दिए थे ...
तो उस विद्यार्थि ने निर्णनय लिया... 
मुक्ती पाने का...
जो सर्वनाश से ही जन्म ले सकती थी।
एक नये व्यक्तित्व के निर्माण के लिए, 
अपने चरित्र की रक्षा के लिए, 
अपने अग्रजों की सिखाई नैतिकता की रक्षा के लिए...
ऐसे गुरू का त्याग —
या 
स्वयं का नाश
निर्णनय लेना आवश्यक हो गया था।

Sunday, September 28, 2025

The Unbearable Complexity—Being Simple!

Be Simple!... is so Complex!


    Hello, fellow digital nomads!—self-proclaimed minimalists, and seekers of the "authentic life." I’m speaking to you today from my sustainably sourced, ethically dubious desk, lit by the gentle glow of my ₹40,000/- laptop, sipping a cup of single-origin extremely OG tap water that cost me ₹0. HA!Ha!...

I'm contemplating the greatest, most beautiful lie of the 21st century: 

the myth of being Simple and Free.

We don't just like these words; we weaponize them. 

They're not ideals; they are political slogans, branding exercises, and the ultimate virtue signaling tools. "We believe in Simple living and Free thought!" the elites cry. 

(Translation: "We're rich enough to choose poverty chic🤫, and your thoughts will remain taxed.")

O'Common—Let’s be honest. 

Simple today is the most complex, high-effort performance imaginable. 

It's the equivalent of that "natural, no-makeup look" which, as every millennial knows, requires about fourteen products, three YouTube tutorials, and a lighting crew. It’s the very embodiment of our society’s glorious, self-congratulatory hypocrisy.

The Performance of Poverty:

Take, for example, the grand, annual pilgrimage to Simplicity.

You know the script. Someone from a fancy metro city posts a stunningly aesthetic, desaturated photo from a village tea stall or a highway dhaba

The lighting is always perfect; the hand is always clutching the rustic earthen kulhad.

The Caption: "So grounded. So real. Just a simple cup of chai and the wisdom of the local folk. The real India. 

#SimplicityGoals #AuthenticIndia #FoundMyself"

The Reality (The Cynic's Cut): They drove 400 km in an air-conditioned SUV with tinted windows (to avoid being too grounded), spent 15 minutes nervously trying to figure out if the local water was a death sentence, bought the chai for ₹10, spent another 20 minutes staging the perfect shot with the expensive DSLR (because phone cameras are too complex to capture simplicity), posted it using a high-speed data package, and then zoomed off to their resort with a heated pool, where they complained about the lack of simple, organic micro-greens on the menu.

Try telling them to actually live that life. To get up at 5 a.m., manage a tiny shop, deal with fluctuating power, and be content being a "Master Ji" from a 1950s black-and-white film—that earnest, slightly underpaid, utterly vital local figure. Suddenly, "simple" becomes "primitive," and the hashtag is quickly swapped for "LuxuryStaycation" and "ThankGodForWiFi."

The Dual Nature of "Free" or copycat to the Great Bollywood Lie?

This brings us to the Dual Nature of Simple and Free. It’s the classic social paradox, perfectly encapsulated by Bollywood.

Consider that legendary song from Mohra, "न कजरे की धार" (Na Kajre Ki Dhaar). The lyrics famously praise the heroine for her effortless, almost "free" beauty: “Na kajre ki dhaar, na motiyon ke haar... phir bhi kitni sunder ho.” (No kohl eyeliner, no pearl necklace... yet how beautiful you are.)

Song: Naa Kajre Ki Dhar | Mohra (1994)

The irony is so thick you could cut it with a knife: The actress on screen was invariably drenched in heavy, period-appropriate makeup! Her "no makeup" was a full, professional, cinema-grade paint job. Her "simplicity" was meticulously crafted by a whole team of artists. That is the perfect critical pun on our modern lives: We praise the simple, but we only accept it when it's meticulously polished and highly funded.

The "Free" look requires the most expensive "complex" tools, the most careful staging, and the most deliberate concealment of effort.

The Thinkers Knew Simplicity Was Hard Work

It’s almost as if the wise thinkers of the past saw this coming. They knew that true simplicity was an inner state, not a cheap marketing stunt.

Rabindranath Tagore once said:

"The simple can only be reached through the complex; I, therefore, cannot begin with the simple."
(Source: The Philosophy of Rabindranath Tagore by S. Radhakrishnan, citing Tagore's views on poetry and truth.)

Tagore understood that it takes a journey through chaos, through understanding the intricacies of the world and the self, to finally arrive at a genuine, unforced simplicity. Our modern attempt to shortcut the complex journey by buying a minimalist wardrobe or paying ₹550 for black coffee is a joke.

And the great psychoanalyst Carl Jung noted the same about the internal struggle:

"Simplicity is the most difficult thing to secure in this world; it is the last limit of experience and the last effort of genius."
(Source: Cited in various compilations of Jung's letters and lectures, reflecting his belief that clarity is hard-won.)

The last limit of experience. It’s not the starting point. It's the summit you only reach after years of complexity. We, however, treat simplicity like a cheap, disposable accessory bought from a roadside vendor whose life we wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole.

Conclusion: The Cons of Being Actually Simple

And here’s the most cynical truth: what are the cons of actually being simple today? They are existential.

  1. You'll Be Unmarketable: Simplicity is a social media dud. Your genuinely simple, clutter-free, drama-free life won't generate "engagement." It's boring.

  2. You’ll Be Underestimated: In a world that equates complexity (fancy titles, jargon, expensive possessions) with importance, genuine simplicity is mistaken for naivety, lack of ambition, or, worse, poverty.

  3. You’ll Miss Out on the Comfort Complex: True simplicity means accepting discomfort—no instant fixes, no high-end health insurance, no backup generator. And who, honestly, wants to give up the very comfort that allows them to romanticize discomfort?

So, the next time you hear someone waxing lyrical about "simple living," watch them closely. Are they documenting their virtue? Is their "free" spirit actually costing them, or others, a fortune?

True simplicity—the kind that Master Ji lives, the kind that costs nothing and asks for everything—remains a beautiful, unachievable theory. For the rest of us, it will remain a highly complex, carefully curated, and beautifully filtered photograph.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go purchase an organic, hand-loomed kurta to convey my deep commitment to being truly, effortlessly simple. I need to nail the lighting for the mirror selfie. It's complicated.🤣🤣

(Inputs are mine—refinements are from AI! to sound simple yet sophisticated!)

Saturday, September 27, 2025

2025_LOCF-Draft by UGC: Education for Muhurat-Mathematics or Moksha?


This blog explores how a discipline built on logic and universality is being lovingly rebranded with cultural embroidery. Is it a renaissance of roots or a ritualistic regression? Let’s decode the draft—one Sanskritized theorem at a time.

From Calculus to Cosmic Cycles

“Mathematics is the language in which God has written the Universe.”
- Galileo Galilei 

But wait, did Galileo forget to mention thatthe God, in those times, had known only the language of languages, i.e., —'Sanskrit' and hence to understand the Universe, and try to comprehend the Brahmanical scripts first. Or you are not culturally rooted and value your traditional ‘ganita-darshan’. 

Thinking, why am I being so critical? It's not me alone; rather, it's the LOCF draft by UGC. Welcome to the brave new curriculum, where mathematics must now bow politely to heritage before daring to speak. The UGC’s LOCF draft doesn’t just teach you how to calculate—it teaches you how to feel the calculation, preferably through the lens of the Indian Knowledge System (IKS), value-based education, and interdisciplinary reverence. Forget abstraction and proof; we now seek moksha through matrices.

The Chairman of the LOCF Committee in Mathematics advocates it as a fact that—

This curriculum reflects a forward-thinking approach, offering students a robust foundation in mathematical concepts and skills, while emphasizing value-based education, interdisciplinary relevance, and integration with the Indian Knowledge System (IKS). It aims to not only preserve the academic rigor of mathematics but also to present it in an accessible and engaging manner for learners from diverse academic backgrounds.”  

However, as a mathematics teacher, I’ve always believed my job was to equip students with the power of logic, reasoning, and the universal language of numbers. So, you can imagine my excitement, or rather apprehension, upon reviewing the UGC's draft Learning Outcomes-based Curriculum Framework (LOCF) for Mathematics. It seems we are about to embark on a grand civilizational journey, not just into the heart of mathematics, but into the very heart of... well, something else entirely.

The new framework, in its noble quest to align with the NEP 2020 and root education in "Indian heritage," seems to have misplaced the very foundations of a modern mathematics degree. As I see it, we're being asked to trade in some of the most critical tools of modern science and technology for a curriculum that feels more like a qualitative inquiry into ancient philosophy.

The Great 'Core' Compromise:

Where in the LOCF structure can one find core mathematics? 

  • Discipline Specific Courses (DSC)—4 credits (divided into Major and Minor)

Then, where to earn the remaining credits from? 

  • Discipline Specific Electives (DSEs)—4 credits

  • General Elective Courses (GECs)—4 credits

  • Skill Enhancement Courses (SECs)—2 credits

  • Value Added Courses (VACs)—2 credits

    The first thing that struck me is how core mathematical competencies have been graciously sidelined. The draft suggests that students might study "real analysis" in their fourth year, making it almost impossible to build upon it for advanced studies. Crucial topics like: linear algebra and abstract algebra are missing the emphasis they deserve. In fact, linear algebra, the bedrock of machine learning and data science, is bizarrely relegated to being just a part of a machine learning course. 

However, Bhaskaracharya (ironically labelled in roman as Bhaskara-II), bijganit and arithmetic is what we are seeking rescue in. The Shulba Sutra, is what we are set to reconstruct the foundations of mathematics with.  

It’s a bold strategy. Let’s prepare students for the 21st century by compromising the very mathematics that drives it. While we aim for Viksit Bharat by 2047, our curriculum seems to be taking a quantum leap backward.

In Pursuit of Indigenous Knowledge... by Copying the West?

In a truly masterful stroke of irony, the defensive argument provided by the former UGC Chairperson, published in the Indian Express, (26th Sept. 2025), cites some international examples as the pursuit of what he calls the "indigenous" curriculum.

We are told to look at how New Zealand has integrated Māori knowledge or how the University of Alaska works with Yupik elders. It’s a fascinating approach: to decolonise our curriculum, we must first follow the pedagogical models of the West. One must appreciate the global vision required to promote a local knowledge system!

This brings me to concepts like Kala Ganana, a concept more relevant for astronomy is the ancient Indian system of time calculation, a philosophical and religious framework deeply rooted in Hindu cosmology that describes a cyclical universe of creation and destruction over immense timescales known as Kalpas and Yugas. While it involves astronomical observations, Kala Ganana is not a scientifically proven theory in the modern sense. It is a spiritual interpretation of the cosmos, with its knowledge derived from sacred texts like the Puranas and Vedas. But this leads to the questions to be researched that—

  • How exactly do we teach this with academic rigor?
  • How will our graduates "prove" their understanding to a global scientific community?
I fear we are creating alchemists in an age of quantum computing. We're being asked to chase elixirs when the world demands algorithms.
But the draft’s primary justification for this restructuring is the integration of the Indian Knowledge System (IKS).

    While the historical development of mathematical ideas is a welcome addition to any curriculum, the LOCF’s approach is shallow and problematic. Instead of a well-designed course placing Indian contributions in a global context, we are offered a long list of courses with content that is mostly at a high-school level and cannot be meaningfully integrated with contemporary mathematics. Perhaps an exam on such "Bharatiya" mathematics would likely involve recalling information, as the calculations themselves are at a school level. This is where the framework becomes truly bizarre, offering absurd choices between a rigorous mathematical subject like calculus or integral transforms and a historical course where a good grade is far easier to obtain. 

Even the contact hours are not justified. A prerequisite to number theory needs students to understand the contribution of Ramanujan for 60 hours, i.e., 15 hours of each unit; however, a course on data structure is only designed for 12 hours of contact. 

Must say it's good news and a cakewalk for rote learners now— Memorize the sutras—clear the exams—LOs achieved! 🎊🎉

Add to this the proposed courses on "Mathematics in Meditation" or "Mathematics in Drama and the Arts" or this whole connotation “Mathematics in ‘X’ ”—and one must seriously ask: 

Where will we find qualified teachers and vetted academic material for such subjects?

The Language Labyrinth and the 'Chosen' Few

My concern deepens when I consider the practical implications for the students. The draft’s reliance on ancient texts like the Tantrasangraha or the Narada Purana etc. presents a formidable barrier.

Must a student now possess a working knowledge of Sanskrit and the ability to interpret complex, often metaphorical, religious texts before they can even begin to study trigonometry or algebra?

~ 'in the making of Sanatan System of Education'.

Mathematics, at its heart, is an equalizer. Its language is universal, its logic accessible to anyone with the aptitude and passion for it. By tying it to specific scriptural traditions, we risk making it exclusive. This approach could alienate students from diverse linguistic and religious backgrounds who are drawn to the objectivity of numbers, not the subjectivity of ancient exegesis. It raises uncomfortable questions about inclusivity in a secular nation. 

Will the classroom of the future require the Mathematician and a Sanskrit Pundit to co-teach a single class? 

This is not a pathway to an enlightened future; it’s a recipe for confusion and chaos.

The Ramanujan Paradox? and the Illusion of Self-Sufficiency⁉️

    Finally, this entire exercise in curriculum redesign leads to a glaring contradiction, which I call the Ramanujan Paradox. The framework implicitly suggests that our ancient knowledge systems are a self-sufficient, all-encompassing fount of mathematical wisdom. If this were true, one must ask: why did Srinivasa Ramanujan, arguably the greatest mathematical genius of modern India, need to send his work to G.H. Hardy at Cambridge? Why do contemporary Fields Medalists of Indian origin, like Manjul Bhargava, work at global centers of excellence like Princeton?

The answer is simple: mathematics is not a civilizational artifact to be kept in a museum. It is a living, breathing, global endeavor. It thrives on collaboration, peer review, and the relentless pursuit of proof that transcends cultural boundaries. To suggest that our students can be prepared for the future by turning inward is a grave disservice. Great minds like Madhava of the Kerala school, who derived infinite series for trigonometric functions centuries before their European rediscovery, did not work in a vacuum. Their contributions are part of a global human story, and they should be taught as such, but at the same time, the contributions of James Gregory and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz cannot be ignored or overlooked as the contemporaries of Madhava from the 17th century. 

Conclusion: The Forward-Looking Future

    No meaningful curriculum reform can be implemented without the ownership and support of the teaching community, a principle the UGC seems to have disregarded. The proposed LOCF for Mathematics is not a forward-looking document.

I highly appreciate, and hold a sense of pride towards Indian mathematicians contributions but as John Dewey states,

"If we teach today's students as we taught yesterday's, we rob them of tomorrow." 

Hence, I find LOCF draft has sacrificed rigor for mathematization wrt. 21st century just by peeking into the past. Less clarity for complexity, and universality for a narrow, unworkable definition of heritage.

     We need to engage in a genuine, nationwide consultation with mathematicians and educators to formulate a curriculum that builds on our strengths. We must create a framework that prepares our students to solve the challenges of tomorrow, equipping them with strong foundations in theory, problem-solving, and adaptability—a curriculum that inspires them to be the next Ramanujan, ready to engage with the world, not retreat from it.

References:

  1. 5756506_Public-Notice-LOCF.pdf https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/5756506_Public-Notice-LOCF.pdf

  2. UGC-LOCF Draft_Mathematics: BA or BSc (Gen)_30.06.2025 https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/9994527_Mathematics.pdf 

  3. https://www.scribd.com/document/281304717/Time-and-Creation

  4. https://ayushdhara.in/index.php/ayushdhara/article/view/1856

  5. https://www.facebook.com/theprintindia/posts/the-university-grants-commission-ugc-has-proposed-a-draft-mathematics-curriculum/812294994734050/

  6. https://www.facebook.com/bhagavanknl/posts/%EF%B8%8F-kaalaganana-reckoning-of-time-introductiontime-is-controlled-by-kaalapurusha-t/838456569826442/

  7. https://nachiketa.org/108-facts-part-1/

  8. https://www.scribd.com/document/549588803/KAALA-GANANA-Reckoning-of-TIME-Hindu-Perspective

  9. http://deojyotishalaya.com/worldwide

  10. https://ijaar.in/index.php/journal/article/download/487/443

  11. https://medium.com/@anand.bhushan.india/the-universal-truth-dharma-a-scientific-and-spiritual-visualization-of-reality-b1654084fe8c

  12. Ramasubramanian, K., & Sriram, M. S. (2011). Tantrasaṅgraha of Nīlakaṇṭha Somayājī. Springer & Hindustan Book Agency. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-036-6

  13. https://vedpuran.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/nard-puran.pdf

  14. https://ia601403.us.archive.org/9/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.133882/2015.133882.Katyayana-Sulba-Sutra.pdf





  

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this piece are entirely personal and are not intended to offend or undermine any individual or group, either intentionally or unintentionally. The narrative draws upon themes discussed in the Indian Express column titled “The Best of Both Sides” (September 26, 2025, page 11), and reflects a critical engagement with its ideas in the context of contemporary curriculum discourse.




Monday, September 15, 2025

दूध का गलास!

कम शब्दों में लिख दूं कैसे?
अपने मन की बात 
पहली सर्विस, पहली गाड़ी 
और हाथो में दूध का गलास।

The year was 2017-18. I was a fresh-faced, perhaps a little naive, Grade 4 teacher, stepping into my very first job. The school, a beacon of learning, was 15 kilometers from my home (30km a round-trip), and my students? They resided in the heart of areas even more remote, nestled away from the bustling city.

I was completely unaware of the unfoldings of destiny on my trusty new Activa 4G 🛵, (which I got by pooling all inhand  collection of both my parents and my little saving, with a T&C to return with 0% interest to them)  and I were about to embark on an adventure I could have never anticipated.

​Life as a new teacher was a whirlwind. 

School days stretched long, often spilling into an extra two or three hours of "hidden agenda" duties – meetings, trainings, and tasks that quietly chipped away at personal time. Sundays and off-days became home-visit days, a self-imposed mission to connect with each of my 50 students. The sheer scale of it was daunting, and truth be told, most visits left me utterly drained, both physically and emotionally. The thought of another dusty road, another unknown doorstep, often filled me with a weary sigh.

​But then, one evening, amidst the fading light of a setting sun, something shifted. My Activa pulled up to a modest home, and as always, the children's faces lit up at the sight of their teacher, and perhaps even more so at the gleaming new scooter! It was a familiar joy, a small spark in my tiring routine.

​What happened next, however, was entirely unexpected. As I stepped inside, the usual offering of chai or quick snacks, common in that part of the state, was replaced by a gesture that melted my weariness. I was offered a tall, frosty glass of creamy milk and some glistening motichoor laddoos. 

In that moment, the tiredness, the frustration, the long hours – they all dissolved. The cool, rich milk was more than just a drink; it was an elixir that seeped into my soul, reviving my spirit and bringing a clarity back to my purpose. I don't remember the exact conversation, nor the faces of the parents, but the feeling of profound gratitude and unexpected hospitality remains etched in my memory.

Those 50 home visits, navigating the remote lanes of Lucknow on my new Activa, were a journey of self-discovery. Each student, each family, contributed a thread to the tapestry of my early teaching days. The 4B batch of 2017-18 wasn't just a group of students; they were my first teachers in a different kind of classroom. They taught me about resilience, about simple joys, and most importantly, about the incredible power of human connection and unexpected kindness.

Even now, years later, I carry the lessons learned from them. They helped shape the person I am today. I miss them dearly, every single one of those bright, eager faces. The taste of that milk and those laddoos is a sweet reminder that sometimes, the most profound lessons and the deepest connections are found in the most unexpected places.

Sunday, September 7, 2025

ADD FRIEND, ADD DRAMA: The Indian Social Media Story!

Add Friend, Add Drama: The Indian Social Media Story

Social media was supposed to be about “networking” and “learning.” 
But if you’ve ever opened Facebook, LinkedIn, or Instagram, you’ll know the real truth:
👉 Women’s “Add Friend” buttons glow like Diwali lights.
👉 Men’s? Well, they mostly attract spam calls and loan offers.
Let’s explore this great mystery—the social media friend request gender divide—from an Indian lens.

👩 The Female Connection Lottery
Women often say: “Uff, so many random friend requests from men I don’t even know.”
Meanwhile, men sit with their phones like disappointed zamindars: “Kuch toh aayega beta… ek din request zaroor aayegi.”
And when it does come?
It’s either from “Priya Tiwari, 0 mutual friends, joined yesterday.”
Or from their own cousin who pressed “Add Friend” by mistake.
Or LinkedIn itself begging: “Please connect with your uncle. He is the only one left.”

🧑 Why Men Send So Many Requests to Women
Three main reasons:
1. Digital Darwinism 🦚
Like peacocks showing feathers, men show friend requests. Out of 100, if 1 gets accepted, it’s considered victory.
2. Networking Excuse 🤝
On LinkedIn, the excuse is always: “Ma’am, professional connection please.” Reality: “Hello, I also breathe oxygen. Let’s connect.”
3. Bollywood Training 🎬
As Bollywood has taught us - Persistence Wins!
If Shah Rukh can chase Kajol across Europe for three hours of runtime, surely sending 500 connection requests is a modest effort.

🧍‍♂️ Do Men Get Female Attention Too?

Short answer: Not really.

Long answer: Sometimes, depending on hairstyle, job, and gym selfies.

In India:
Government job = aunties’ attention offline.

DSLR + tilted head = some likes online.

Posting sunrise quotes = “At least he’s positive.”

Six-pack abs = 99% comments are still from other dudes: “Nice bro 💪🔥.”

So yes, women get attention by default, men have to earn it like JEE rank—painfully and competitively.

🇮🇳 The Indian Judgement Society
Here, people don’t just check marksheets—they check your friend list too.
Woman with too many male friends online: “Beta, focus on UPSC. Facebook won’t feed you.”
Man with too many female friends: “Wah hero! Jaldi shaadi kara do.”
Both with only same-gender friends: “Good children. Very sanskaari. Surely vegetarian.”
And on LinkedIn:
She has 10k followers? → “Talented!”
He has 10k followers? → “Unemployed, clearly free.”

🪞 The Truth Nobody Admits

Let’s face it:
Women’s inboxes overflow, but 70% are from bored men trying their luck.
Men’s inboxes are empty, but the rare ones they get may actually be genuine.
In India, social media is just the new playground for rishta aunties with Wi-Fi.

⚖️ A Modest Proposal for Balance
Here’s how we fix this chaos:
1. Friend Request Tax 💸
Every request to opposite gender = ₹5 GST. Imagine the revenue. Free Wi-Fi in every village!
2. Connection Entrance Exam 📑
Before “Add Friend,” men must answer:
Do you know this person?
Is this professional?
Will you DM “Hi dear” at 2 a.m.?
Only pass = only request.
3. Quota System 🗳️
For every 10 male requests a woman gets, she should also receive 2 female requests. Gender equality at last!

🎭 Final Thoughts
Why do women get more requests? Because men think “Add Friend” is the first step in the romance syllabus.
Do men get female attention? Only if they’re gym-ready, salary-ready, or reel-ready.
And in India? People judge your social media connections like election results—serious faces, spicy gossip, and someone crying in the corner.

Moral of the story: Behind every 500+ connections is either a genuine networker… or someone who just clicks “Accept All” like it’s a sale on Flipkart.

" तू है हरजाई, तो अपना भी यही तौर सही  
तू नहीं, और सही; और नहीं, और सही।"

Poet: Dr. Aasif Riyaz Qadeer

This couplet appears in the book Nadir o Nayab Ashar (p. 57), published by National Book Foundation, Pakistan, in 2014 .

The SSH-Stories!

Point of Concern